Community Forest Associations Boundaries and Sustainable Forest Management in Loita Forest, Narok County, Kenya

Kiramba Lestan Kimiri *

Department of Environmental Studies and Community Development, School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

Felix L. M. Ming’ate

Department of Environmental Studies and Community Development, School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

Eric M. Kioko

Department of Environmental Studies and Community Development, School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The Kenya Forest Act of 2005, subsequently revised in 2016, introduced the Kenya Forest Service and its mandate to engage in Participatory Forest Management (PFM) agreements with local communities adjoining state forests. This framework necessitated the establishment of Community Forest Associations (CFAs) nationwide, including the Loita Community Forest Association. However, a prevailing concern surrounding CFAs is the delineation and redefinition of boundaries, an issue that has gained prominence due to Kenya's decentralized forest governance system and the ambiguity surrounding the management of locally-held common resources. This study centers on investigating the process of establishing boundaries for the CFAs both in forest resources and the users within Loita Forest in Narok County, Kenya. Notably, Loita forest operates under a Traditional Participatory Forest arrangement, controlled by community elders, led by the revered Oloibon, who steers the resource utilization decisions. The vast expanse of Loita forest encompasses both lush woodlands and savanna landscapes. Employing purposive sampling, the study engaged 52 respondents from nine distinct Loita sub-locations. Key informants were interviewed individually, complemented with focus group discussions conducted with the use of semi-structured questions. Participant observation further enriched data collection, consolidating insights from key informants and group discussions. Collected data was meticulously tape-recorded and subjected to summative content analysis. The inquiry delved into the practicality of existing traditional resource-use boundaries, the adequacy of governmental regulations, policies, and institutions in elevating forest governance within Kenya, and the extent to which individual indigenous rights have been upheld in managing and using communal forest resources. Key findings of this study show that the Loita Maasai still values their traditional norms and have great respect for cultural institutions. Major decisions concerning the management of Loita forest are made by the council of elders led by the Chief Laibon. The study also found that there exists no CFA in Loita forest and that the presence of government institutions in the forest is minimal. This study's outcomes contribute to a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between indigenous wisdom, modern frameworks, and sustainable forest management. It underscores the indispensable role of tradition in shaping boundaries, governance, and ecological equilibrium within Loita forest and offers practical directives for future forest management endeavors.

Keywords: Community forest association, forest management, indigenous knowledge, loita, sustainability


How to Cite

Kimiri , K. L., Ming’ate , F. L. M., & Kioko , E. M. (2023). Community Forest Associations Boundaries and Sustainable Forest Management in Loita Forest, Narok County, Kenya. Asian Journal of Geographical Research, 6(4), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajgr/2023/v6i4200

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

KFS. Participatory Forest Management Guidelines. Nairobi: KFS; 2015a.

FAO. State of the world’s forests: Forests and Agriculture-Land Use Challenges and Opportunities. Rome; 2016.

Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Bose P, Dijk VH. Dryland forests management and social diversity in Africa and Asia. Springer; 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19405-9

McDermott, M. H. (2000). Boundaries and pathways: Indigenous identity, ancestral domain, and forest use in Palawan, the Philippines. University of California, Berkeley.

Friedman RS, Rhodes JR, Dean AJ, Law EA, Santika T, Budiharta S, et al. Analyzing procedural equity in government-led community-based forest management. Ecology and Society. 2020; 25(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11710-250316

Mawa C, Babweteera F, Tabuti JRS, Tumusiime DM. Changes in vegetation characteristics following a decade of community forest management in mid-western Uganda. International Forestry Review. 2020;22(3):323-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1505/146554820830405636

Rotich B, Makindi S, Esilaba M. Communities attitudes and perceptions towards the status, use and management of Kapolet Forest Reserve in Kenya. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation. 2020;12(4):363-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2018.1448

McGinnis M, Ostrom E. Linking Local and Global Commons, Harvard Center for International Affairs, Cambridge, Massachusetts; April 23-25, 1992.

Nyagwalla Otieno J, Bellotto V, Esho LS, Van den Broeck P. Conserving the Sacred: Socially Innovative Efforts in the Loita Enaimina Enkiyio Forest in Kenya. Land. 2023;12(9):1706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091706

Ming’ate FLM, Bollig M. Local rules and their enforcement in the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Reserve co-management arrangement in Kenya. Journal of East African Natural History. 2016;105(1): 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2982/028.105.0102

Government of Kenya. The Forest Act of 2005. Nairobi: The Government Printer; 2005.

Musyoki JK, Ming’ate FLM, Muriithi JK. Factors Determining Household Membership to Community Forest Association for Participation in Management of Upper Imenti Forest, Meru County, Kenya. Open Access Library Journal. 2022;9(10):1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109209

Mogoi J, Obonyo E, Ongugo P, Oeba V, Mwangi E. Communities, Property Rights and Forest Decentralization in Kenya – Early Lessons from Participatory Forest Management. Conserv. Soc. 2012; 10:182–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.97490

Ongugo RA, Osumba PA, Tuzo PM. Traditional Forest Use and Institutional Change: Case Study of Loita Community Forest, Narok South District, Kenya. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons (IASC) in Hyderabad, India; 2011.

Toulmin C, Quan J. (Eds.) Evolving Land Rights, Policy and Tenure in Africa, DFID/IIED/NRI, London 2000.

Mbuvi MTE, Kungu JB. A transforming traditional community-based forest management: The case of Loita community forest, Kenya. Heliyon. 2021; 7(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07380

Ming’ate FLM, Rennie HG, Memon A. NGOs Come and Go, but Business Continues: Lessons from Co-management Institutional Arrangements for Governance of the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Reserve in Kenya, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology; 2014. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2014.968237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.968237

Kariuki PM, Njoka JT, Saitabau CL, Saitabau HS. Forest governance, livelihoods and resilience: the case of Loita forest (Entime e Naimina enkiyio), Narok County, Kenya. Dryland Forests: Management and Social Diversity in Africa and Asia. 2016;117-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19405-9_6

Riamit SK. Indigenous people and the Naimina Enkiyio forest in Southern Kenya: A case study, W.V. Alangui, G. Subido, R. Tinda (Eds.), Indigenous Peoples, Forests and REDD Plus: Sustaining and Enhancing Forests through Traditional Resources, Tebtebba Foundation. 2010;1-58.

Obare, L Obare. Forest User Needs, Gender and Geographic Information Systems: an Integrative Approach to Managing the forest of the Lost Child. Master’s Thesis, McGill University. 2003; 137,

Accessed on 23rd November 2012.

Lesorogol C. Land Privatization and Pastoralist Well-being in Kenya. Development and Change. 2008;39(2): 309-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00481.x

Lester S. An introduction to phenomenological research. Stan Lester Developments, Taunton; 1999. Available:http://www.sld.demon.co.uk/resmethy.pdf

Longurst R. Interviews: In-Depth, Semi-Structured. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography; 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00458-2

Bernard HR. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (1st ed.). New York: Sage; 2012.

Mbuvi MT, Musyoki JK, Ongugo PO. Equity Mechanisms in traditional forest management Systems: A case study of Loita forest in Kenya. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 2015;34(4):380- 405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2015.1010092

García AK. Exploring the ‘layeredness’ of recurring natural resource conflicts: The role of Loita Maasai leadership in the Naimina Enkiyio Forest conflicts in Kenya. Land Use Policy. 2017; 65:66-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.032

KFS. Forest Law Enforcement and Governance in Kenya. A paper prepared for the East African Community-led regional process in the framework of the Ministerial Declaration, Yaoundé, Cameroon, October 16, 2003, on the Africa Forest Law Enforcement and Governance (AFLEG); 2007.

Blackman A, Corral L, Lima ES, Asner GP. Titling indigenous communities protects forests in the Peruvian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(16):4123-4128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603290114

Maundu P, Berger D, Ole Saitabau C, Nasieku J, Kipelian M, Mathenge S, Höft R. Ethnobotany of the Loita Maasai. People and plants working paper. 2001;8.

Nankaya J, Nampushi J, Petenya S, Balslev H. Ethnomedicinal plants of the Loita Maasai of Kenya. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020; 22:2569-2589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00311-w